How do technologies change the meanings of biological and environmental processes?
My research moves between bioart, HCI, and critical theory. Through installations, biosignals, haptic media, and language models, I study how a living process becomes perceptible, interpretable, and shareable—without reducing it to a human voice or a neutral source of data.
[ RECURRING QUESTIONS ]
Agency
When plants, fungi, sensors, and models take part in an artwork, how is agency distributed?
Translation
What is gained, altered, or silenced when a biological signal becomes image, sound, or language?
Embodiment
How can vibration, touch, and space make environmental relation felt through the body?
[ RESEARCH MAP — PROJECTS AS BRIDGES ]
The map traces how the projects carry questions across different materials and methods. Select a point to follow one path.
HOVER FOR LABELS · CLICK A NODE TO TRACE · DRAG OR ZOOM TO EXPLORE
Research–Creation is the overall field: projects are not outcomes placed after research, but the bridges through which questions, materials, and methods reshape one another.
[ METHODS ]
These methods are not neutral tools. Each one changes what can be sensed, translated, and understood within a living–technical relation.
01
Sensing
Attending to biological and environmental activity that is otherwise difficult to perceive.
02
Signals
Treating vibration, electrical activity, and cardiac rhythm as situated traces rather than self-evident data.
03
Language models
Testing how computational systems repeat, transform, and generate language from biological or textual sequences.
04
Projection
Returning computational output to living matter and architectural space as light.
05
Haptics
Making environmental relations available through touch, vibration, and visceral sensation.
06
Spatial installation
Situating visitors inside a system so that observation becomes participation.